Scully, Olga
JONES v SCULLY [2002] FCA 1080
Federal Court of Australia
Jones v Scully [2002] FCA 1080 (2 September 2002)
Last Updated: 2 September 2002
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Jones v Scully [2002] FCA 1080
HUMAN RIGHTS - racial discrimination - racial hatred - publication and distribution of leaflets - proceedings to enforce determination of Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission - de novo hearing - whether publication and distribution of leaflets was reasonably likely to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate Jews in Australia - objective test to be applied - relevance of evidence of persons actually being offended, insulted, humiliated or intimidated - relevance of truth or falsity of leaflets - offensive behaviour - whether act done "because of" race, colour or national or ethnic origin - meaning of "ethnic origin" - whether Jews in Australia are a group of people with an "ethnic origin" - whether leaflets were published and distributed reasonably and in good faith - whether leaflets were published and distributed for any genuine purpose in the public interest - whether any leaflets were a "fair and accurate report" - whether any leaflets were "fair comment"
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) Part IIA - whether invalid - freedom of communication concerning political or government matters - whether Racial Discrimination Act effectively burdens freedom of communication about government or political matters - whether reasonably appropriate and adapted to serve a legitimate end - legitimate end sought to be achieved
DEFAMATION - applicable principles in determining whether material conveys pleaded imputations - whether imputations would be conveyed to an ordinary reasonable reader of the leaflets - characteristics of ordinary reasonable reader
EVIDENCE - historical evidence - admissibility as to facts in issue - general principles - evidence in books and videos - discretion to limit use of evidence - Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 136
WORDS AND PHRASES - "because of" - "offend" - "ethnic origin"
Racial Discrimination Act (1975) (Cth) Part IIA, s 18B, 18C, 18C(1)(a), 18C(1)(b), 18D, 18D(a), 18D(b), 18D(c)(i), 18D(c)(ii)
Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 52
Racial Hatred Bill 1994 (Cth)
Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 136
Crimes Act 1914 (Cth)
Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 19
Jones v Scully (2001) 113 FCR 343 referred to
Harris v Caladine (1990-1991) 172 CLR 84 considered, applied
Australian Communist Party v Commonwealth (1951) 83 CLR 1 applied
Ritz Hotel v Charles of the Ritz (1987) 14 NSWLR 107 considered
Bellevue Crescent v Marland Holdings (1998) 43 NSWLR 364 considered
Hagan v Trustees of the Toowoomba Sports Ground Trust [2000] FCA 1615 applied
Creek v Cairns Post Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 1007 applied
ACCC v Optell Pty Ltd (1998) ATPR 41-640 considered
Patrick v Cobain [1993] 1 VR 290 applied
Worcester v Smith [1951] VLR 316 considered
Ball v McIntyre (1966) 9 FLR 237 considered
King-Ansell v Police [1979] 2 NZLR 531 applied
Mandla v Dowell Lee [1983] 2 AC 548 referred to
Commission for Racial Equality v Dutton [1989] 1 QB 783 referred to
Miller v Wertheim [2002] FCAFC 156 followed
Hagan v Trustees of the Toowoomba Sports Ground Trust (2001) 105 FCR 56 applied
Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd v Marsden (1998) 43 NSWLR 158 cited
Versace v Monte [2002] FCA 190 cited
Irving v Penguin Books Ltd [2000] EWHC QB 115 applied
Nationwide News Pty Ltd v Wills (1992) 177 CLR 1 referred to
Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd v The Commonwealth (1992) 177 CLR 106 referred to
Theophanous v Herald & Weekly Times Ltd (1994) 182 CLR 104 referred to
Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1997) 189 CLR 520 applied
Koowarta v Bjelke-Petersen (1982) 153 CLR 168 considered
Brandy v HREOC (1994-1995) 183 CLR 295 considered
Minister of State for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs v Ah Hin Teoh (1994-1995) 183 CLR 273 cited
Oberoi v HREOC [2001] FMCA 34 cited
Watson, Blackmore, Hosking Criminal Law (NSW) Vol 2
Fleming The Law of Torts 9th Ed. 1998
JEREMY JONES v OLGA SCULLY
N 154 OF 2001
HELY J
2 SEPTEMBER 2002
SYDNEY (HEARD IN LAUNCESTON AND SYDNEY)
...for more go to,
Scully v Jones [2002] FCA 1396 (8 November 2002)
Jones v Scully [2002] FCA 1080 (2 September 2002)
Jones v Scully [2001] FCA 879 (13 July 2001)
updated 03.2003 CAERS' Press
. recomnetwork . antiracist .
©2003. CAERS' Press
keywords:
Jones v Scully Federal Court of Australia racial discrimination racial hatred Human Rights



